Mayor Richard Daley all but endorsed a proposal by Alderman George Cardenas to put a tax of 5 to 25 cents on bottled water during budget negotiations this fall. The tax would vary depending on container size and would help to generate revenue for the city’s water fund. They also hope it will steer people away from plastic bottles that “burden the city’s waste system,” Cardenas said.
Joe Doss, president and CEO of the International Bottled Water Association, believes the proposal is a bad idea. “Increasing the cost of bottled water might encourage people to buy a less healthy beverage,” he said.
When asked whether it was fair to punish people for following doctors’ advice to stay hydrated, the mayor said, “Well, it all depends what effect you’re having upon the environment—not just upon their body, but upon the environment.”
Newly appointed Environment Commissioner Suzanne Malec-McKenna said she’s not concerned that a bottled water tax would discourage the healthy habit. “The bottom line is, we want people to drink water and we have some of the best water in the United States that you just turn on in your tap….There are a lot of different ways to hydrate,” she said.
Bottled water has been under attack from environmentalists across the country. Oil is used to make and transport plastic bottles. Empty bottles fill up landfills.
Earlier this year, San Francisco and Los Angeles jump-started the campaign against a drink that has come to epitomize good health — by banning non-emergency city purchases of bottled water. Ann Arbor, Mich., followed suit.
New York is encouraging a return to tap water in a “Get Your Fill” campaign that offers consumers who agree to boycott plastic water bottles a free stainless steel container to fill at the tap.
Last year, Illinois ranked No. 7 in the country for bottled water consumption—with every resident drinking an average of 21 gallons. That amounted to a 48 percent increase over five years.
They’ve raised gas prices (although they are going down now). They upped the cost of milk, the CTA….why not our water? I know that Chicago, and the state of Illinois, have an enormous amount of debt…but consumers shouldn’t be punished for it. I think they just slap the name of “environmentally friendly” on their plans to fool us thinking our money is actually helping. In reality, our money doesn’t do a thing.
For example, if they do raise fares on the CTA, where is that extra money going to? Are we going to see cleaner trains? Will seats and turnstiles that are often broken be repaired? Will there be better lighting in some of the underground tunnels where people wait? Could they afford to hire some more pleasant people who actually help the customer instead of blow them off? I wouldn’t mind paying more money if I knew I’d see some changes around the CTA. Personally I think the CTA will lose customers. I think people who buy bottled water will keep buying bottled water.
Daley wants to make Chicago into the greenest city in the U.S. Well how is that going to happen when the fare to take the train is too much or the condition of the trains and buses are horrible and we just decide to drive? I still don’t see how he’s planning to hold the Olympics here if we can’t even please the people of Chicago with our transportation.